Ad Position, CTR & Quality Score - We're Going to do What we Already Did
New post at the AdWords blog this morning about our favorite topic, the quality score. Before I get to the meat of this post I wanted to highlight one line from that post:
"Clickthrough rate (CTR) is the most significant component of Quality Score"
(We already knew that...just added in case anyone is still unclear about how they can improve their quality score...)
Ok now on what this post is actually about. For years Google has said - in person and in writing that ad position is taken into consideration (normalized) in terms using CTR to determine the quality score. More precisely Google has said:
Misconception: Showing up in a higher position will benefit my Quality Score
Fact: Quality score is normalized to compensate for differences in performance for ads in different positions.
- An ad in a higher position is predisposed to get a better CTR.
- An ad above the search results is predisposed to get a better CTR.
The post today on the AdWords blog says:
"As you probably have observed, ads in high positions typically earn better CTR than those in low positions, because ads in high positions are more visible to searchers. To calculate the most accurate Quality Scores, it's important that the influence of ad position on CTR be taken into account and removed from the Quality Score.
In the coming days, we'll update the portion of the Quality Score algorithm that accounts for ad position. This will result in more accurate Quality Scores, ensure that ads compete fairly for position based on their quality and bid, and enable Google to show the most relevant ads to searchers by rewarding high-quality advertisers with better ad positions."
Based on what Google has said in the past I think the majority of advertisers assume that what Google is saying they are now going to "update" has indeed already been in place for years. I mean can you make some thing more normalized?
A column I read at Search Engine Land this this morning further adds to the confusion. The article states:
"In the past, CTR was all equal. No matter how high or low your ad appeared, an impression on the ad was an impression and it counted towards your quality score equally. For example, if your ad was in the 8th position, on the first page of a search result, you were less likely to be clicked on than an ad in the first or second position. But since the CTR was calculated equally, Google did not take into account that the first or second ad would have a higher probability of being clicked on than an ad in the 8th position. This upgrade will change that and now will take into account the ad position while calculating the quality score. Google said this should make the quality score more accurate, allow ads to “compete fairly” and show searchers more relevant ads."
So after reading everything this morning I think we're left with 2 choices:
1) CTR already is and has been normalized by ad position in relation to calculating the quality score. Google's now somehow going to do this "better". If someone could explain to to a simpleton like myself how this may work I would appreciate it.
2) The SEL column is correct and up until this announcement there has been no normalization for CTR/quality score at all.
Personally, I lean towards #1 based on all the data I've seen over the past few years but given the fact that up until somewhat recently advertisers really couldn't even see their quality score with any level of granularity I won't say I could produce factual data to back up my assumption. I'm just curious how this could be done "better" as Google is now claiming they are going to do.
Any thoughts?



